On hastily declaring platonic dialogues spurious: the case of Critias

Title: On hastily declaring platonic dialogues spurious: the case of Critias
Creator: Tarrant, Harold
Relation: Methexis Vol. 31, Issue 1, p. 47-66
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24680974-03101003
Publisher: Brill
Resource Type: journal article
Date: 2019
Description: This paper takes issue with the thesis of Rashed and Auffret that the Critias that has come down to us is not a genuine dialogue of Plato. Authors do not consider the style of the Critias, which should be a factor in any complete study of authorship. It observes the widespread consensus that the style of the Timaeus and Critias are virtually inseparable. It surveys a wide range of stylistic studies that have tended to confirm this, before answering a possible objection that cites the similarity of style between the genuine Laws and Philip of Opus' Epinomis. Since the main argument used by Rashed and Auffret relies on an inconsistency between Timaeus and Critias consideration is given to the types of inconsistency found within Platonic dialogues and sequences of dialogues, particularly the hiatus-avoiding dialogues including Timaeus itself and Laws. Finally, alternative explanations of the alleged inconsistency are offered.
Subject: plato; late dialogues; authenticity; Critias; style; inconsistency; narration
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1470596
Identifier: uon:48514
Identifier: ISSN:0327-0289
Language: eng
Reviewed

		Thumbnail	File	Description	Size	Format